Change Password
Bam
October 22, 2026 12:10 AM
Dear Krishna ji, this is what I have been saying from the start. I respect and love Sri Parshurama. But for this lineage specifically, it was written that Sage Durvasa initiated Sri Ashwatthama. That's why I have been doubting the credentials of Kuru ji's and Herodoin ji's website from the start. If they were given purnabhishek by Shri Raviji. He would have surely tell them about the Guru Parampara. The lineage of Sri Dattatreya and Sri Parshurama mentioned in the new website is mentioned by many other Sri Vidya lineage and is easy to know from some other source apart from Shri Raviji. Thank you for bringing this into light.
Krishna
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste Dear Prince. This is precisely the reason why heavily guarded treatises must be made available to the general public for research purposes and for gaining greater clarity. The publicly available literature outside of Tamil Nadu does not reference Vallalar's philosophy. There is still ongoing research on Tirumantiram and other Tamil literature expounding on tantras. To be honest, not much is known of Vallalar outside of Tamil Nadu and his teachings are now finding attention amongst research scholars unlike in the past. I recently met an elderly person who advised me to abandon everything I do and focus only on Vallalar's teachings. I believe, we should therefore welcome perspectives from all sources, whether these are negative or positive. Just the way the rays of light beyond the horizon dispel the darkness of night, let knowledge reveal the Truth and dispel ignorance! I certainly look forward to getting more perspectives and information that you can share with us. I am still backlogged at this point and will keep my promise of publishing the material you have previously provided to us. Once again, a very big thank you from the bottom of my heart for all the information you continue to share with us!
RASIT
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste Kuru ji, hats down, I know what you mean and you proved your point!!
Kuru Sandhyasa
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste Kashik. Yes. This is in fact the same formula invoked within gayatri and many many other mantras as you know. The purpose of this is to have alignment with trilokya, in this way obstacles are cleared. This is not only to do with clearing on all three levels, but to do with the yoga formed when alignment happens with all three worlds in a balanced manner. If we think about what is at the root of all obstacles, they are generally regarded as knots (or restraints as you had put it) caused by previous impressions or accumulated karma. The release of these knots is the act of clearing obstacles. With regards to how to do it, there should be a particular method given with the mantra. As far as I know, in ordinary practice, astra mudra is held or fingers are snapped toward each of the four directions while reciting digbandha mantra. This is done three times. In Svacchanda Tantra for instance, a much more elaborate method is given for the particular process of digbandha which is provided there. I would say to be as precise to the sadhana you are following as possible, but if no other method is given, then holding of astra mudra- or snapping of the fingers- clockwise in each of the four directions 3 times is standard practice.
Kashik
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste kuru ji, i want to ask another question at the it says "भूर्भुवस्सुवरों इति दिग्विमोकः । " Which roughly translate to " Bhūr Bhuvaḥ Suvaḥ” is the formula for releasing the directional restraints (Digvimoka)." Do we need to release directional restraint? Why? And how to do it.
Bam
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Dear Prince, you said what I wanted to say. I really cant comprehend and understand how Kuru ji and Herodion ji can be Raviji's disciple. They have the tendency to punch down whatever they dont understand. Saying bad about Sri Vallar and what not. Even Shri Raviji in his old articles has confirmed Jesus and Prophet Mohammad as a legit path. Also, saints as great as Sri Ramakrishna Paramhamsa practiced Islam and Christianity and said to have a darshan of Prophet, Jesus and Mother Mary. They are trying to contain divinity to Rupa and nama bheda, which is useless.. Similar to Vallalar, Mahamahescvaracharya Abhinavagupta is also said to have Attained the Body of Pure Light. Lets see them also declining that. Please I request both of them to not make fun of things they can't comprehend. If it doesn't match your world view, please ignore and keep quiet.
Kuru Sandhyasa
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste Rasit, I will take the liberty of responding to this comment. Firstly, with regards to the rules of uttara nivesha, as I had said previously I did not write them. Though I do feel constructive discussion should be had, I meant no harm in my comments, any of my comments which have seemed aggressive were aimed only with the purpose of disillusioning people. Secondly, with regards to masses being pushed away, we have no issue with this, as we do not want to attract masses, in fact it is quite the opposite. Our purpose in initially forming was for those silent members of the community who had felt lost and wanted to reconnect with the original teachings. Everything we do is voluntary, and it takes quite a bit of time, we want to make sure we are giving our time to those who are genuine and clear sighted. Thirdly, yes I was the cintia account. I wanted to show you all how easy it is to appear like Tivra and talk like Tivra, it is quite easy and those who have no discernment here will simply praise and worship you. If I could do it and you have formed a lowly opinion of me, what makes you think Tivra is any different? Because they do not break the act? My reason for using the name and flag was of course so as Tivra would see it. This whole thing is very much common sense and not very elaborate, but I hope it has proved a point to you.
RASIT
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste Prince, and thank you for correcting my mistake. Obviously my research wasn't comprehensive enough which led me to a wrong conclusion. You citing scriptures while showing me where I went wrong is the kind of correction I respect. When I am wrong then I am wrong, and thank you again educating me while correcting me!!
Kashik
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
Namaste prince, could you please answer my previously asked questions.
Tvaritha
October 21, 2026 11:10 PM
When establishing siddhAnta, one requires hetu or reason and padArtha, lest it be apasiddhAnta. All Astikas like us agree that the shruti is svatahprAmANya, but different schools arise during the interpretation of these scriptures. For example, there are bhedavAkyas in the shruti, so Shri MAdhavAcArya took these to be literal, or the primary meaning, while Jagadguru Shri Adi Shankaracharya took them to be pedagogical. When either come across verses that may seem, at the surface level, in contrast to their own, they resolve it through upacAra. For example, there is a Western saying that a shepherd is his flock but it is obvious that a shepherd is not many sheep, but the person who takes after them. Since his livelihood and identity is tied to the sheep, it is said so. They are able to do this, and hold their views to be true, because, they have, to the best of their abilities, grounded their bhAShyas and prakaraNagranthas in shruti in such a way that when their interpretation is applied to the shruti, it still remains cogent. When the work is not even implicitly grounded in the scripture, it is treated as kalpanA In the same manner, when the revered BhAskararAyar Makhin, a great scholar he did not simply speculate, but attempted to syncretize Tantra and shruti (eg; Deriving panchadashi from Atharva Veda saṃhitAs). Other scholars like Shri Appaya Deekshithar have also done the same for shaivAdvaita. It would not be fair to say their works have no scriptural basis. I am not trying to argue but we must respect the epistemic foundations, laid by our poorvacharyas and propounded by our Gurus. Hara Hara Shankara Jaya Jaya Shankara _/| |\_
RECENT COMMENTS
COMMENTS