Change Password
Log Out

COMMENTS

Amargi
July 05, 2026 10:07 AM

Mr, there are many things that must stay beyond our comprehension, - such are death and purity of initially "impure" stuff. Guru must have such knowledge and siddhi to perform bali. It all comes with true sadhana. We either find our Guru and believe him in all we cannot understand, either we are not born for this path

Vishnu
July 05, 2026 09:07 AM

I checked it.. Can I ask how to remove all bad karma, previous birth sins by chanting mantra. Which God / Goddess is suitable for fast sins, bad karma burning / remove?

Ujjal
July 05, 2026 12:07 AM

Can this Mahakala Bhairav mantra protect us from Abhichar kriya like if somebody has done Maran , Ucchatan on US can this protect us plz answer I am in dire need of your answer.

Ita
July 04, 2026 11:07 PM

Do I have to be initiated to say this Mantra Japa?

Mr
July 04, 2026 09:07 PM

In hindu tradition it is said that kamakhya is adisthatri devi of all mahavidhya and tantra sadhna ; ok then my question is if she is divine mother of me, isn't she the divine mother of all others? isn't she the divine mother of goats? isnt she the divine mother of birds? how can one mother be pleased by their child bali? also further my question is Amba took kaali roop for rakta beej blood soaking purposes and for asuras death; her ugra roop ate asuras to establish dharma on earth ; and thats very natural that devi took ugra roop for asura death etc.... but this i don't get , how bird and goats bali can please her when u r calling her a divine mother? do u think goats and birds are asuras like rakta beeja whose death is required just like rakta beej or chand mund to establish dharma on earth? actually sorry if i have hurt anybody but these questions are haunting me from so much time and i asked multiple people but didnt get any satisfactory responses, i think this platform has many good sadhakas like prince ji , krishna ji , tivra ji , ram ji , amargi ji , kaushik ji ; tripurghana ji and many more; hopefully anyone can satisfy me with their answers .... thank u in advance

Kashik
July 03, 2026 12:07 AM

hello mr please check the comment made by lorran in this article "https://manblunder.com/articlesview/panchakuta-tripura-bhairavi-mahamantra"

Kashik
July 03, 2026 12:07 AM

hello mr. the variation of siddha kunjika depending on sampraday. The 14 slok is not found in common saptashati book that are published. The correct navaran mantra is "-ऐँ ह्रीँ क्लीँ चामुण्डायै विच्चे " om is added depending on guru instruction. here तथा can be though as likewise. साँ सीँ सप्तशतीं सिद्धिं कुरुष्व जपमात्रतः is correct as far as i know it is a variation.

Amargi
July 03, 2026 12:07 AM

Mr, hello. i only know the 9-syllable mantra is complete; i have nothing to say on why to put om in it. You may find the living knowledge full of śakti in recent comments of Tīvra, on this mantra; please pay attention, since i believe that a seeker may take a Path directly from Tīvra; i am not a Master to share something except pointing on those whom i believe. About removing impurities from mantra, i guess it is a mistake. What impurities in the Goddess? Navakșari is a great mystery. Knowledge comes from the Guru to Shishya through Sadhana, and this all is pervaded by Goddess' will. We say "this mantra gives ", - this means that the receiving of this mantra in diksha is a true promise from God(dess) that you now may take all this through life full of sadhana. Then it is Kali who becomes a mantra for you, it is your Guru's Power given to you. Mantra is nothing else; until you know mantra is a Deity, it is futile; you see, it is all about your own relations with the Goddess and the Guru. Alright, finally, - yes, this mantra is enough for all we may wish; find the simple way of practice that Tīvra gave recently.

Mr
July 02, 2026 09:07 PM

respected krishna sir i wanted point out some errors here ; sir u have mentioned here अथ मन्त्रः -ऐँ ह्रीँ क्लीँ चामुण्डायै विच्चे । ; bt in chandi navakshari article u had only mentioned om ऐँ ह्रीँ क्लीँ चामुण्डायै विच्चे | , doesnt both of this contradicts each other ? वाँ वीँ वूँ वागधीश्वरी तथा ; खाँ खीँ खूँ खेचरी तथा ; sir i dont think in sidh kunjika तथा makes any significant meaning ; in साँ सीँ सप्तशतीं सिद्धिं कुरुष्व जपमात्रतः ; u forgot sir tu mention "सूँ" ; i think all three ll come together साँ सीँ सूँ in that part ; also if i m wrong then let me know correct knowledge too , this is my doubt and krishna sir u r the only active guru currently who cn clear our doubts blessed to have u in my life ...... also any knowledgable person can enlighten me on this doubts nd clear it ; thanks all respected gurus

CATEGORIES

ARTICLES