Same appearing as two can never be called created... In Srimad Devi Bhagavatam, MulaBhagavati Bhuvaneswari divided herself into two and became Siva, Bhuvaneswara Mahadeva. Does that mean Siva was created?? So, if you accept this theory of creation, then you have to also accept the theory which I pointed out too. I disagree to both as neither Siva or Sakthi created each other. Both are combos of Sivasakthi, while they just take incharge of those tatvas. In both ocean and sea, water is what that is present. Devi is that water, hence cannot be called either ocean or the sea separately. If you wanna follow Saiva understanding in this post, which is really vital, then no issues at all. But if you say all posts on this website would follow this theory, then it is extremely unfair and degradatory towards the worshippers of Devi. I have read your articles on Srihari and Bhagavat Gita where none of these theories are shown but Narayana is shown as Parabrahman. Then why none of your articles focusing on Lalita didn't actually pointed out the fact that She is Parabrahmam?? Why falsely portray Her as being created while She herself mentions that She is both the creator and creation? Isn't that some sort of fanaticism? If you only talk about Trika on this article, it is very true. But it is goes very contradictory and wrong for articles on Devi or Narayana paratvam. Or, you can easily say that this is a Saiva oriented website and not a Srividya website. I and my disciples would just walk away from a website where Devi's Parabrahma tatvam is made a mockery! If you really understand about the sampoorna tatvam of Nirvana Sundari who shines beyond the amakala, then you should have been concerned more than me regarding this matter. Anyways, thank you for showing the true colour and intention of this website.... Aum Sri Mathre Namah

ŚrīBālā mantras provide the foundation and basis for Śrīvidyā. It should be noted that the Śuddha Pañcadaśī mantra becomes the Saubhāgya Pañcadaśī mantra only when it is combined with the Tryākṣarī Bālā mantra. For the Bālā mantras to be effective, this kavacam is considered essential. It maybe substituted by equivalent kavacams of Śrī Lalitā when one is reciting Her mantras. The decision of the guru must be considered final and his/her advice overrides my suggestions here.

It would be 4 bījas.

āgacca āgacca is correct. Thank you for pointing out the errors. It has now been corrected for both the articles that you have pointed out. We are grateful for the input from your end.

jvala jvala is correct. It was a typo on my part. Thank you for pointing out the errors!

Even if one is initiated into panchadashi mantra one should recite bala kavacha? इदं कवचमज्ञात्वा श्रीविद्यां यो जपेच्छिवे । स माप्नोति फलं तस्य प्राप्नुयाच्छस्त्र घातनम् ॥ १३ ॥ No benefits accrue to the Śrīvidyā devotees or to those who perform the japa or recitation of Śiva mantras, if the knowledge of this kavacam is not bestowed.

Krishna ji, Kindly confirm if the mantra " Oum Shreem Hreem Shreem" is called mantra with 3 beejas or 4 beejas.

Thanks a ton Krishnaji. What an amazing knowledge you have. Never expected there is so much to the Bija I wrongly thought was Fe. Thank you again..

Krishna ji , the mantra words are aagracha , aagracha or agaccha agaccha. Please clarify.

Dear Krishna ji, Is it Jvala Java or Jvala Jvala Shoolini? Please clarify