Thank you for your efforts. This document will help: https://drive.google.com/file/d/199cdy3YLLxnLlMUxantWvvl-OPbEm1xQ/view?usp=sharing Blessings.

Krishnaji, Most common Vipreet Pratyangira Moola Mantra I saw is: om aim hreem shreem pratyangire maam raksha raksha mam shatroon bhanjay bhanjay fe hum phat swaha One of the source : https://www.scribd.com/doc/35363636/Vipreet-Pratyangira-Mantra-Sadhna-Evam-Siddhi-and-Puja-Vidhi The version you listed above has "Phrem" 1.Is this a different source/variation? 2.What is Bija "Fe" indicate? Never saw "Fe" elsewhere other than in Vipreet Pratyangira Moola Mantra. thank you.

You can approach anyone who's practicing Durga Saptashati and Caṇḍī navākṣarī mantra.

You should only practice this with an initiation from a living siddha guru who can guide you through the whole procedure including the yantra worship etc. This is a very high-level mantra, as you have clearly pointed out.

We are still working on this document and hope to complete it in the coming week or so. We shall definitely consider translating the stotras that you are suggesting. I personally do not have the caliber to do it, but will try my best.

Sir may I be initiated in kunjika mantra by a proper guru? Do you know any such guru? May I contact him?

Sir do you know any guru who gives diksha in kunjika mantra? May I contact him?

Mahākāla Saṃhitā 14th Patal: “She (kālī) has Many Crores of her forms which are beautiful, in all of them “The Tripurasundari” is the Ultimate Beautiful Form. and She has Eight Crore avatars or manifestations which are furious in appearance of which “Kamakala Kali ” is the Ultimate furious form ”. How safe this mantra is to recite?

Dear Lorran, I do understand that both are one and the same. I see Siddhilakshmi as a form of Lalithambika herself. We all who see oneness will never mock other schools to promote ours, as how the website article is written. That article is very wrong about Srividya or Mahalakshmi of Srivaisnava. If they wish to promote Siddhilakshmi upasana, they should talk its greatness, not criticise other schools. If that is right, then what Zakir Naik did to promote Islam by mocking other religious groups also can be considered right!

There is nothing to be so emotionally reactive here. Just because they mentioned it is as per siddha kaula traditions, does that mean any of the scriptures talk about it? Well, I dare anyone to show me which authentic scripture says Srividya is below Siddhilakshmi as they claim! If you say there are many tantrik traditions from nepal which claim siddhilakshmi to be supreme, then why not you name those traditions??? There could be one or two, which may exist here and there but do you think it is right for them to place other schools inferior to promote theirs? Comparing the traditions available for both Devis (I know both are one and the same), it it well known that Lalita prevails in many aspects. Even to me, I consider siddhilakshmi as Purna Chandika who is absolute as per Devi Mahatmyam. It is not about the bedham here. It is about their false claims and as a devotee of Srividya Parameswari, I have all rights to comment. Lol ...Just as you support that website which without evidence claims 'as per siddha kaula dharma', in the beginning of my comment itself I have stated that I am commenting as a Srividya upasaka. So, in Srividya, everything begins from and finally ends in Lalitha. Srividya is all and end of all things. All margas merge into Srividya Saagaram, as per Srividya upasana. So, if you are of another belief, you don't have to either believe or comment, and falsely claim something without showing scriptural evidence. Every school is free to consider their Deva to be absolute, but comparing and mocking other schools in a public platform is simply filthy and Barbaric!! Haha... Are you sure no Vaisnava would accept that? I have seen many Vaisnavas whom are Srividya upasakas too and I am sure they accept it. As per Vaisnava tradition, there are many repeatation of dasavataras and once their job is done, they return to their specific abodes within Vaikunta dharma, where the one and only Parama Narayana resides. As per Vaisnavas, Devi is the internal potency of Narayana, known as Yogamaya and Mahamaya. The same Lalita Sahasranama which calls Amba as 'Karanguli Nagotpanna Narayana Dasakrtih' also calls Her as 'Narayani', 'Vaisnavi', 'Visnumaya', 'Padmanabha Sahodhari', which all refer to her Yogamaya aspect. Therefore, it is valid as per both Srividya and Vaisnava. Additionally, to support this, I can show many scriptures from puranas to tantras and also commentaries by well known acharyas. Could you show any reference which falsely support their siddha dharma claims about Srividya???