COMMENTS


Svarupanandanatha
October 27, 2020 09:37 AM

So how does one determine where om is added and where om is not added? Another place on this website, it was said that om should be added everywhere quoting an upanishad. Adding or not adding om should be based on tantra and not convenient interpretation no? Why then add om to shodashi, navakshar, bala etc.

Krishna
October 27, 2020 08:07 AM

No it is not prefixed and this is a mantra that should be followed strictly, as per the advice of the initiating guru.

Krishna
October 27, 2020 08:05 AM

You can interpret as hands and fingers holding the weapons.

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 24, 2020 10:27 PM

Thank you, please clarify my other doubt regarding "weapons.. "

MANBLUNDER
October 24, 2020 06:39 PM

Thank you for pointing out the error. It is षडङ्ग-देवदायुक्ता ṣaḍaṅga-devadāyuktā, which is now corrected. 

Lorran
October 24, 2020 07:52 AM

Pranava “oṃ” is prefixed in this mantra?

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 23, 2020 08:04 PM

Guruji, refer nama 393. Ashtama siddhis are detailed. Garima is mentioned in dhyana slokam as one of them, whereas, she's not mentioned in nama 393. Please clarify

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 23, 2020 07:31 PM

Another one guruji, in the meaning given for nama 386, please refer to the sentence "these six parts are heart....eyes and weapons " weapons.... Is it right Sir? If so, can you please detail a little more guruji?

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 23, 2020 07:15 PM

Namasthe. I invite your attention to nama 386. Please clarify, whether it is Shadanga, shad + anga, seems correct. The text shows shadanaga. Kindly clarify

MANBLUNDER
October 23, 2020 11:51 AM

Jālandhara-sthitā is correct. Thank you for pointing out the mistake. It stands corrected.