Change Password
Anonymous
May 17, 2014 12:50 PM
Your most usefull article till date on Manthras.
AUM.Ravi
May 17, 2014 09:41 AM
Dear Respected Readers,Thank you for your active participation. Following are my replies to various queries raised by the article followers.1. There is no need to chant Om before chanting of Maha Sodasi. This opinion was clearly given in the article.2. The bija Om is sixth in Maha Sodasi mantra and meaning of which was given by Shri Raviji in his main article. Please read carefully Shri V.Ravijis main article. He clearly differentiated between first Om and sixth Om.3. Yes, mahsodasi has also traits of Om.4. I am referring to sixth bija (Om) of maha sodasi. As per our tradition we don't chant Om before start of Maha Sodasi. 5. No references available with me for replacing Om with Atma bija. Hope above clarified the various queries raised by devotees.
AUM.Ravi
May 17, 2014 09:41 AM
Dear Respected Readers,Thank you for your active participation. Following are my replies to various queries raised by the article followers.1. There is no need to chant Om before chanting of Maha Sodasi. This opinion was clearly given in the article.2. The bija Om is sixth in Maha Sodasi mantra and meaning of which was given by Shri Raviji in his main article. Please read carefully Shri V.Ravijis main article. He clearly differentiated between first Om and sixth Om.3. Yes, mahsodasi has also traits of Om.4. I am referring to sixth bija (Om) of maha sodasi. As per our tradition we don't chant Om before start of Maha Sodasi. 5. No references available with me for replacing Om with Atma bija. Hope above clarified the various queries raised by devotees.
MANBLUNDER
May 17, 2014 02:12 AM
My detailed reply is provided in this link. IMPORTANCE OF OM AT THE BEGINNING OF ALL MANTRAS
MANBLUNDER
May 17, 2014 02:12 AM
My detailed reply is provided in this link. IMPORTANCE OF OM AT THE BEGINNING OF ALL MANTRAS
Anonymous
May 15, 2014 08:21 PM
I am a regular reader of this site, but these comments are confusing me. There are two Om in Mahashodasi - one before and one in the second line. Which Om is Aum Ravi referring to when he says that the Om has a different meaning in Mahashodasi? The second Om is to be replaced with the Atma Bija. Does Aum Ravi agree replacing the second Aum with Atma Bija?
Anonymous
May 15, 2014 08:21 PM
I am a regular reader of this site, but these comments are confusing me. There are two Om in Mahashodasi - one before and one in the second line. Which Om is Aum Ravi referring to when he says that the Om has a different meaning in Mahashodasi? The second Om is to be replaced with the Atma Bija. Does Aum Ravi agree replacing the second Aum with Atma Bija?
Anonymous
May 15, 2014 07:48 PM
This article may be related to this subject
http://www.kamakotimandali.com/blog/index.php?p=1388&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Anonymous
May 15, 2014 07:48 PM
This article may be related to this subject
http://www.kamakotimandali.com/blog/index.php?p=1388&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Anonymous
May 15, 2014 06:19 PM
Dear Shri Aum Ravi,Thank you for taking the time to provide your opinion on this matter. I seek further clarification from you. It is not clear if you agree on adding Om before MAHA SODASI or not. When you start the comment, you mention “It is to be keenly observed that, Maha sodasi only has Om and no Om is there in sodasi (laghu) and panchadasi mantra-s.”And towards the end, you mention “From the above discussion, it can be concluded that, Om need not be chanted before maha sodasi.”Not sure if there was a typo, but do you agree on adding Om before MAHA SODASI or not?From your discussion, it can be inferred that if a mantra has the traits of Om, there is no need of adding Om. You explained how Sodasi/Panchadasi have the traits of Om and therefore Om is not added. Two questions follow this :-1) It can be argued that MAHA SODASI also has the traits of Om since the Panchadasi is integrated in it. So why should we add Om before MAHA SODASI?2) What will happen if we add Om before Panchadasi/Sodasi(laghu)? Will it not fructify?The final question is regarding the “different meaning” of Om in MAHA SODASI. Raviji’s original explanation does not seem to show a different meaning. A little more clarity in this regard will help.Both Shri Aum Ravi and Raviji are requested to comment on this.Thanks,Anonymous Disciple
RECENT COMMENTS
COMMENTS