Change Password
Log Out

COMMENTS

MANBLUNDER
May 09, 2013 11:04 PM

This can be explained like this. Unity with Bhagavati is the state of Bliss or ānanda. This is not the state of liberation. When one remains in the state of Bliss for certain time (possibly running to years), liberation is attained. Here too, liberation cannot be attained on our own will. She has to pave way for that. Lalitā Sahasranāma says that She alone can impart knowledge of Shiva. Typically speaking ahaṁ Brahmāsmi means I am Shiva. This is often explained as Śivohaṁ (I am Shiva). The ultimate reality is one can attain liberation only through Her and when we mean liberation, it is the state of being with Shiva.

MANBLUNDER
May 09, 2013 11:04 PM

This can be explained like this. Unity with Bhagavati is the state of Bliss or ānanda. This is not the state of liberation. When one remains in the state of Bliss for certain time (possibly running to years), liberation is attained. Here too, liberation cannot be attained on our own will. She has to pave way for that. Lalitā Sahasranāma says that She alone can impart knowledge of Shiva. Typically speaking ahaṁ Brahmāsmi means I am Shiva. This is often explained as Śivohaṁ (I am Shiva). The ultimate reality is one can attain liberation only through Her and when we mean liberation, it is the state of being with Shiva.

brahmananda
May 09, 2013 10:45 PM

Is that SELF is brahman. the state is practically "aham brahmasmi"state ? unity with bhagavati?regards

brahmananda
May 09, 2013 10:45 PM

Is that SELF is brahman. the state is practically "aham brahmasmi"state ? unity with bhagavati?regards

brahmananda
May 08, 2013 06:37 PM

Hope scholars will be able to get it done regards

MANBLUNDER
May 08, 2013 05:32 PM

It seems to be difficult to get this translated. I have referred this to a few Sanskirt scholars. But I am not too sure if I can get this done.

MANBLUNDER
May 07, 2013 08:47 PM

I will go through this and will let you know by tomorrow. Thanks for the link

brahmananda
May 07, 2013 08:38 PM

http://www.kamakotimandali.com/blog/index.php?p=1217&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1

MANBLUNDER
May 07, 2013 07:14 PM

It is not one of the 108 Upaniṣad-s. I have checked with Indological book houses and nobody seems to be aware of this. Please provide a link so that I can find out more on this.

brahmananda
May 07, 2013 06:54 PM

Dear ravi jiDid you get kali medhadikshopanishad?

CATEGORIES

ARTICLES