COMMENTS


mona
February 13, 2010 05:01 AM

who r u not a commoner like me such vast knowledge and profound understanding thnk u 4 all that u give pl i want lalitapakhyan and brahmand puran

Sriram
February 10, 2010 09:08 PM

its a good article.I am intrested on reading your article.

Sriram
January 31, 2010 11:16 PM

This is one of the best explanation of Sri Rudram.ThanksSriram.S

Anonymous
January 31, 2010 10:38 PM

Dear Ravi, This is one of the best blogs i have ever seen on internet. Its really intresteing. I just started read each and every article on this blog.Let me read completly and post my queries to you at the end of the week.ThanksSriram.S

mona
January 16, 2010 08:03 PM

i want it fast the full names explained its helpful to concentrate in goddess thank u very much

IEDig.com
January 13, 2010 02:37 PM

IEDig is a social contentwebsite where your readers or you cansubmit content to. If you have a good story, members will'Vote' the postand write comments. As a blog owner, you may wantto make it easy for and encourage your readers to Visit on Your Blog.

mona
January 12, 2010 11:56 AM

i am thank ful to u 4 the lalaita explanation though it is not enough. i understand devi better. pl give all the names after 294an d detailed description . also want material from bramhand puran . iam srividya diksha disciple of babaji shivanad my shiva. thans i can never thank u enough 4 ur service

SC Bhandari
December 28, 2009 06:52 PM

well written and explained. I will like to draw attataintion to two words 'loksangrah' and 'rituals'.The non-attached people work for 'loksangrah'; they have no interest to perform their own work and are rather more ready to do work which is in the interest of society. They have expanded their circle from personal to family to locality to village to state to country to world and beyond. During this process conflict of intrest arises but they choose higher circle and thus benifits the society. This choice can confuse a normal person.As for 'rituals' this is not used in slok. rituals normally means work done asper 'shastra' or karm-kand. But meaning here is any one who is still attached and doing work with perfection, he shall not be distracted by 'jhyani' person. Example is that of a good shopkeeper / sales person doing his duties deligently and a 'yogi' comes and tell him and confuse by saying that you donot take God's name or do puja, is not good. rather he should create example so that he follws him volenteerly.

SALIL GEWALI
December 25, 2009 10:30 AM

twitterlinkedinDear Sir,I am impressed with your blog !May I share something worth-knowing ??Yes, please visit the website ( http://www.slideshare.net/sgewali2000/what-is-india-current-b-1615487 ) and open the slides to know the  significance of Hinduism in the words of greatest western scholars ---- like, Albert Einstein, Mark Twain , T. S. Eliot, Julius Robert Oppenheimer --- father of Atomic bomb, George Bernard Shaw, H. G. Wells, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Voltaire , Friedrich Hegel, Werner Heisenberg so on and so forth !!It has already published in book form.Let me know your worthy comments on this !!

Karin
December 22, 2009 09:20 PM

First off, I want to say that I enjoy your postings very much. The breadth of your knowledge and degree of accuracy with respect to kundalini is astounding. Lately I have been reading your Kundalini Unraveled, and I’m finding it very helpful. You approach the subject matter in a very reasonable, easy-to-understand manner. I have a few questions for you, although I’m not even sure what I want to ask. I suppose I should start by saying that about a year ago, I believe I experienced "kundalini rising" for the first time. When it first happened, I went through a pretty huge upheaval. In the weeks following the initial rising, I wished I could have undone it all. I wished I could have stuffed the serpent back in her box and leave her there for the next lifetime (if there was such a thing at all). My nervous system was extremely disturbed. I couldn’t sleep; my emotions were turbulent; I had no mental focus. At the root, I was in a constant state of fear. But eventually I knew I had to adapt. I had to accept that this energy was now alive in my system, and there was nothing I could do about it. So I surrendered, gradually, over a period of months. And here I am now. Now I feel pretty good. In fact, I feel great. I feel harmonized and integrated. However, I feel like I have only integrated the magnitude of kundalini currently active in my system. I sense that her potential magnitude is far greater than what I am currently experiencing. Sometimes, while in a state of meditative absorption with the sensations of my body (and consequently the sensations of kundalini), the energy at the base of my spine and throughout my body sharply increases in intensity. So I break the absorption out of fear of triggering a state I am not ready to equilibrate into. But as soon as I slip back into a state of absorption, the intensity increases again, and begins to penetrate my higher granthis, which frightens me. So I find myself hardening my physical armor, until the process is over. I fear this hardening is counter-productive and potentially damaging to my body. Anyway, I’m not sure what I’m asking. Basically I’m wondering if you have any advice for a confused, guru-less Westerner such as myself. I just read page 21 and 22 of your book, about reaching the heart chakra, and somehow I believe this approximates where I am. For example, I am having the experience of Ishta Deva, in the form of Jesus Christ, which is highly surprising and amusing to me, although it makes sense, since I was raised as a Catholic. (I also agree with your opinion with respect to Maya. All hail the Intellect!) I won’t be surprised if I’m wrong, though, since I haven’t really been able to predict anything with respect to this since the beginning of my journey. Thank you again for your wonderful writing!