Change Password
Log Out

COMMENTS

Krishna
October 28, 2020 07:05 AM

The mantra derivation from the relevant tantras, should be the source to determine if there is an om̐ to be added or not. However, it is most important to not follow mantras from a book or any other type of publication, but to actually receive it from a practicing guru. The role of a guru and the guidance received is sacrosanct and must be followed strictly. In our guru lineage, the mantras that were initiated had om̐ prefixed and the same has been provided here for the benefit of those who wish to follow this tradition. Yes, the mantras when sourced to the relevant tantras may not have an om̐ prefixed or replaced. But also there are many secrets that are not openly revealed. We are very thankful that a path to the highest mantra was revealed and initiated to all the sincere devotees without any barriers related to their origin of birth etc. In addition to the monumental efforts of Shri Ravi guruji and the selfless service he has rendered for the benefit of all seekers, We are also making a small effort to catalog and publish some other mantras that have been derived from tantras AS IS, without any modifications. This is by no means an invitation to practice as one pleases, but is simply a reference to understand the inner meaning of the underlying concepts that may aid practitioners succeed in their spiritual path. We sincerely advice seekers to find a good guru and follow their advice.

Svarupanandanatha
October 27, 2020 09:37 AM

So how does one determine where om is added and where om is not added? Another place on this website, it was said that om should be added everywhere quoting an upanishad. Adding or not adding om should be based on tantra and not convenient interpretation no? Why then add om to shodashi, navakshar, bala etc.

Krishna
October 27, 2020 08:07 AM

No it is not prefixed and this is a mantra that should be followed strictly, as per the advice of the initiating guru.

Krishna
October 27, 2020 08:05 AM

You can interpret as hands and fingers holding the weapons.

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 24, 2020 10:27 PM

Thank you, please clarify my other doubt regarding "weapons.. "

MANBLUNDER
October 24, 2020 06:39 PM

Thank you for pointing out the error. It is षडङ्ग-देवदायुक्ता ṣaḍaṅga-devadāyuktā, which is now corrected. 

Lorran
October 24, 2020 07:52 AM

Pranava “oṃ” is prefixed in this mantra?

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 23, 2020 08:04 PM

Guruji, refer nama 393. Ashtama siddhis are detailed. Garima is mentioned in dhyana slokam as one of them, whereas, she's not mentioned in nama 393. Please clarify

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 23, 2020 07:31 PM

Another one guruji, in the meaning given for nama 386, please refer to the sentence "these six parts are heart....eyes and weapons " weapons.... Is it right Sir? If so, can you please detail a little more guruji?

vijimahadevan2301@gmail.com
October 23, 2020 07:15 PM

Namasthe. I invite your attention to nama 386. Please clarify, whether it is Shadanga, shad + anga, seems correct. The text shows shadanaga. Kindly clarify

CATEGORIES

ARTICLES